linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/18] MIPS: DTS: jz4780: fix pinctrl as reported by dtbscheck

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:24:49 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] MIPS: DTS: jz4780: fix pinctrl as reported by
 dtbscheck

On 09/04/2022 15:22, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>
>> What does that mean? One cannot create multiple patches and apply them?
> 
> This patch set was created by some automatic scripts. And they produce one patch
> per group of warnings.
> 
> But here you ask me to merge 4 unrelated topics into a single one.
> 
> Or do you mean something else?

You can edit a commit, right? git commit --amend? So where is the problem?

> 
>>
>>> And they are not related. Every one is based on a different .yaml
>>> schema file.
>>
>> Which does not matter, because the name of the node does not matter. We
>> enforce it in schema to makes things organized and easier in testing.
>> This does not fix any real problem, just the problem we created by
>> ourselves with schema.
>>
>>>
>>> That in all cases the result looks similar comes from similar
>>> requirements by the schemata and has no inherent connection.
>>
>> All schemas will require it, won't they? The same for arm...
> 
> We may be talking about different things here.
> 
> My understanding:
> you ask me to merge 5/18, 8/18, 9/18, 12/18 because they contain "controller" in the node-name.
> 
> Right? If not then we must clarify that first.

No. I ask you to fix all pin-controller cases, for entire MIPS, not just
one.

And in one month one more. And then again one more.


Best regards,
Krzysztof