linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: Introduce fast accessor to clock tai

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 09 Apr 2022 22:33:41 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: Introduce fast accessor to clock tai

On Sat, Apr 09 2022 at 09:37, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat,  9 Apr 2022 10:12:58 +0200
> Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/timekeeping.h |  1 +
>>  kernel/time/timekeeping.c   | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> If the time keeping folks are OK with this and ack it, I'm happy to
> take this through my tree.

Go ahead. I just sent a Reviewed-by and I don't see conflicting changes
in that area. Famous last words :)

Thanks,

        tglx