linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: Introduce fast accessor to clock tai

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87k0bvfibm.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Mon, 11 Apr 2022 22:58:37 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: Introduce fast accessor to clock tai

On Sat, Apr 09 2022 at 22:33, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09 2022 at 09:37, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Sat,  9 Apr 2022 10:12:58 +0200
>> Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de> wrote:
>>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/timekeeping.h |  1 +
>>>  kernel/time/timekeeping.c   | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> If the time keeping folks are OK with this and ack it, I'm happy to
>> take this through my tree.
>
> Go ahead. I just sent a Reviewed-by and I don't see conflicting changes
> in that area. Famous last words :)

And yes, I have some conflicting changes in the pipeline and just saw
that this lacks a data_race() annotation like the boot variant from
which this is derived.

Let me pick this up into a rc2 based branch. I'll tag it and provide it
to you for consumption.

Thanks,

        tglx