linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <31178c33-e25c-c3e8-35e2-776b5211200c@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:03:40 -0500
From:   john.p.donnelly@...cle.com
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        chenguanyou <chenguanyou9338@...il.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     dave@...olabs.net, hdanton@...a.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mazhenhua@...omi.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        quic_aiquny@...cinc.com, will@...nel.org, sashal@...nel.org,
        John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more
 consistent

On 4/11/22 1:40 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 4/11/22 14:26, john.p.donnelly@...cle.com wrote:
>> On 2/14/22 9:47 AM, chenguanyou wrote:
>>> Hi Waiman, Greg,
>>> This patch has been merged in branch linux-5.16.y.
>>> Can we take it to the linux-5.10.y LTS version?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As a FYI:
>>
>> We have observed that following lockup with this commit added to 
>> 5.15.LTS:
>>
>> d257cc8cb8d5 - locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more 
>> consistent (4 months ago) <Waiman Long>
>>
>> The "fio" test suit fails with LVM devices composed of four NVME 
>> devices with these observed lockup, panic.
>>
>>
>>
>> ext4:
>>
>> PID: 3682   TASK: ffff8f489ae34bc0  CPU: 2   COMMAND: "dio/dm-0"
>>  #0 [fffffe0000083e50] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffff828772b3
>>  #1 [fffffe0000083e58] nmi_handle at ffffffff82840778
>>  #2 [fffffe0000083ea0] default_do_nmi at ffffffff8337a1e2
>>  #3 [fffffe0000083ec8] exc_nmi at ffffffff8337a48d
>>  #4 [fffffe0000083ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff8340153b
>>     [exception RIP: _raw_spin_lock_irq+23]
>>     RIP: ffffffff8338b2e7  RSP: ffff9c4409b47c78  RFLAGS: 00000046
>>     RAX: 0000000000000000  RBX: ffff8f489ae34bc0  RCX: 0000000000000000
>>     RDX: 0000000000000001  RSI: 0000000000000000  RDI: ffff8f47f7b90104
>>     RBP: ffff9c4409b47d20   R8: 0000000000000000   R9: 0000000000000000
>>     R10: 0000000000000000  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: ffff8f47f7b90104
>>     R13: ffff9c4409b47cb0  R14: ffff8f47f7b900f0  R15: 0000000000000000
>>     ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
>>     <NMI exception stack> ---
>>  #5 [ffff9c4409b47c78] _raw_spin_lock_irq at ffffffff8338b2e7
>>  #6 [ffff9c4409b47c78] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff82925be9
>>  #7 [ffff9c4409b47d28] ext4_map_blocks at ffffffffc11c26dc [ext4]
>>  #8 [ffff9c4409b47d98] ext4_convert_unwritten_extents at
>> ffffffffc11ad9e0 [ext4]
>>  #9 [ffff9c4409b47df0] ext4_dio_write_end_io at ffffffffc11b22aa [ext4]
>>
>> xfs:
>>
>> PID: 3719   TASK: ffff9f81d2d74bc0  CPU: 37  COMMAND: "dio/dm-0"
>>  #0 [fffffe0000894e50] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffffad6772b3
>>  #1 [fffffe0000894e58] nmi_handle at ffffffffad640778
>>  #2 [fffffe0000894ea0] default_do_nmi at ffffffffae17a1e2
>>  #3 [fffffe0000894ec8] exc_nmi at ffffffffae17a48d
>>  #4 [fffffe0000894ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffffae20153b
>>     [exception RIP: _raw_spin_lock_irq+23]
>>     RIP: ffffffffae18b2e7  RSP: ffffbb7ec9637c48  RFLAGS: 00000046
>>     RAX: 0000000000000000  RBX: ffff9f81d2d74bc0  RCX: 0000000000000000
>>     RDX: 0000000000000001  RSI: 0000000000000000  RDI: ffff9f81c04a918c
>>     RBP: ffffbb7ec9637ce8   R8: 0000000000000000   R9: 0000000000000000
>>     R10: 0000000000000000  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: ffff9f81c04a918c
>>     R13: ffffbb7ec9637c80  R14: ffff9f81c04a9178  R15: 0000000000000000
>>     ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
>>     <NMI exception stack> ---
>>  #5 [ffffbb7ec9637c48] _raw_spin_lock_irq at ffffffffae18b2e7
>>  #6 [ffffbb7ec9637c48] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffffad725be9
>>  #7 [ffffbb7ec9637cf0] xfs_trans_alloc_inode at ffffffffc074f2bd [xfs]
>>  #8 [ffffbb7ec9637d50] xfs_iomap_write_unwritten at ffffffffc073ad15
>> [xfs]
>>  #9 [ffffbb7ec9637dd0] xfs_dio_write_end_io at ffffffffc072db62 [xfs]
>>
>>
>> I have reached out to Waiman and he suggested this for our next test 
>> pass:
>>
>>
>> 1ee326196c6658 locking/rwsem: Always try to wake waiters in out_nolock 
>> path
> 
> Does this commit help to avoid the lockup problem?
> 
> Commit 1ee326196c6658 fixes a potential missed wakeup problem when a 
> reader first in the wait queue is interrupted out without acquiring the 
> lock. It is actually not a fix for commit d257cc8cb8d5. However, this 
> commit changes the out_nolock path behavior of writers by leaving the 
> handoff bit set when the wait queue isn't empty. That likely makes the 
> missed wakeup problem easier to reproduce.
> 
> Cheers,
> Longman
> 

Hi,


We are testing now

ETA for fio soak test completion is  ~15hr from now.

I wanted to share the stack traces for future reference + occurrences.


Cheers.

JD



...