linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <89175c40-5f12-d83f-a42b-60c6f353514e@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Apr 2022 12:33:45 -0500
From:   "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     broonie@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, ardb@...nel.org,
        nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com, sjitindarsingh@...il.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename
 args to unwind()



On 4/8/22 09:44, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:51:38AM -0600, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
>> Hey Mark Rutland, Mark Brown,
>>
>> Could you please review the rest of the patches in the series when you can?
> 
> Sorry, I was expecting a new version with some of my comments
> addressed, in case that had effects on subsequent patches.
> 

Yes. I realized that. I am actually working on the next version addressing the
comments I have received.

>> Also, many of the patches have received a Reviewed-By from you both.
>> So, after I send the next version out, can we upstream those ones?
> 
> I would very much like to upstream the ones I have given a Reviewed-by.
> 
> Given those were conditional on some adjustments (e.g. actually filling
> out comments), do you mind if I pick those into a series now?
> 
> Then, once that's picked, you can rebase the rest atop, and we can
> review that.
> 

That would be great! Thanks!

Madhavan