[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YlKD3oz3HqQnucyc@hyeyoo>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 16:14:38 +0900
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To: JaeSang Yoo <js.yoo.5b@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Ohhoon Kwon <ohkwon1043@...il.com>,
Wonhyuk Yang <vvghjk1234@...il.com>,
Jiyoup Kim <lakroforce@...il.com>,
Donghyeok Kim <dthex5d@...il.com>,
JaeSang Yoo <jsyoo5b@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: remove meaningless node check in ___slab_alloc()
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 11:42:39PM +0900, JaeSang Yoo wrote:
> node_match() with node=NUMA_NO_NODE always returns 1.
> Duplicate check by goto statement is meaningless. Remove it.
Yeah, I think node = NUMA_NO_NODE here is to remove constraints
when later calling get_partial_node() or new_slab().
So no further check is required.
>
> Signed-off-by: JaeSang Yoo <jsyoo5b@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 9fe000fd19ca..a65e282b8238 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2913,7 +2913,6 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
> */
> if (!node_isset(node, slab_nodes)) {
> node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> - goto redo;
> } else {
> stat(s, ALLOC_NODE_MISMATCH);
> goto deactivate_slab;
> --
> 2.25.1
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Thanks!
>
>
--
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists