[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8930bbfe-2c33-ea90-c48d-c6a00005b6a5@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 21:11:29 +0530
From: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc: vdumpa@...dia.com, Snikam@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 3/4] dt-bindings: memory: Update reg maxitems for
tegra186
On 4/11/2022 8:59 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 4/11/22 18:02, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/10/2022 7:51 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>
>>>
>>> 06.04.2022 08:24, Ashish Mhetre пишет:
>>>> memory-controller@...0000 {
>>>> compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-mc";
>>>> - reg = <0x0 0x02c00000 0x0 0xb0000>;
>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x02c00000 0x0 0x10000>, /* MC-SID */
>>>> + <0x0 0x02c10000 0x0 0x10000>, /* Broadcast
>>>> channel */
>>>> + <0x0 0x02c20000 0x0 0x10000>, /* MC0 */
>>>> + <0x0 0x02c30000 0x0 0x10000>, /* MC1 */
>>>> + <0x0 0x02c40000 0x0 0x10000>, /* MC2 */
>>>> + <0x0 0x02c50000 0x0 0x10000>; /* MC3 */
>>>> + reg-names = "mc-sid", "mc-broadcast", "mc0", "mc1",
>>>> "mc2", "mc3";
>>>
>>> The "mc-" prefix feels redundant to me, I'd name the regs like this:
>>>
>>> "sid", "broadcast", "ch0", "ch1", "ch2", "ch3"
>>>
>>>
>>> You should also add validation of the regs/reg-names to the yaml based
>>> on SoC version. I.e. it's not enough to only bump the maxItems.
>>
>> Okay, I will add validation of reg-names as following:
>>
>> reg-names:
>> minItems: 0
>> maxItems: 6
>> items:
>> - const: sid
>> - const: broadcast
>> - const: ch0
>> - const: ch1
>> - const: ch2
>> - const: ch3
>>
>>
>> We will have to keep minItems to 0 in order to make it compatible with
>> old DT, right?
>
> Bindings are about the latest DTs. In general older dtbs must be updated
> and you must get error from the schema checker for older DTs. It's only
> drivers that should care about older dtbs.
On v5 Krzysztof mentioned that old DTS will start failing with new
bindings https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/3/22/907.
So I just wanted to confirm whether it's fine if updated bindings
start to fail with old DTS?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists