[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9qU7x3=KsjfH0qDW=isdcGxTweHbssvshYxkV5iHpamGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:07:58 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] m68k: use ktime_read_raw_clock() for
random_get_entropy() instead of zero
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 10:18 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h
> > index 6a21d9358280..5351b10e1b18 100644
> > --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static inline unsigned long random_get_entropy(void)
> > {
> > if (mach_random_get_entropy)
> > return mach_random_get_entropy();
> > - return 0;
> > + return ktime_read_raw_clock();
>
> I'd rather do something like this in a common header:
>
> unsigned long random_get_entropy_fallback(void);
>
> and use random_get_entropy_fallback() in the architecture specific
> files.
>
> That way you can encapsulate the fallback implementation in the random
> code and if it turns out that ktime_read_raw_clock() is a stupid idea or
> someone has a better idea then you have to change exactly one place and
> not patch the whole tree again.
Absolutely. That's a good idea. I'll do that for v3.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists