[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sfqkf2y1.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:18:30 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] m68k: use ktime_read_raw_clock() for
random_get_entropy() instead of zero
On Sun, Apr 10 2022 at 23:49, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> In the event that random_get_entropy() can't access a cycle counter or
> similar, falling back to returning 0 is really not the best we can do.
> Instead, at least calling ktime_read_raw_clock() would be preferable,
> because that always needs to return _something_, even falling back to
> jiffies eventually. It's not as though ktime_read_raw_clock() is super
> high precision or guaranteed to be entropic, but basically anything
> that's not zero all the time is better than returning zero all the time.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
> ---
> arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h
> index 6a21d9358280..5351b10e1b18 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h
> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static inline unsigned long random_get_entropy(void)
> {
> if (mach_random_get_entropy)
> return mach_random_get_entropy();
> - return 0;
> + return ktime_read_raw_clock();
I'd rather do something like this in a common header:
unsigned long random_get_entropy_fallback(void);
and use random_get_entropy_fallback() in the architecture specific
files.
That way you can encapsulate the fallback implementation in the random
code and if it turns out that ktime_read_raw_clock() is a stupid idea or
someone has a better idea then you have to change exactly one place and
not patch the whole tree again.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists