[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220411061758.2458417-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:17:58 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix misleading add event pmu debug message
Fix incorrect debug message:
Attempting to add event pmu 'intel_pt' with '' that may result in
non-fatal errors
which always appears with perf record -vv and intel_pt e.g.
perf record -vv -e intel_pt//u uname
The message is incorrect because there will never be non-fatal errors.
Suppress the message if the pmu is 'selectable' i.e. meant to be selected
directly as an event.
Fixes: 4ac22b484d4c79 ("perf parse-events: Make add PMU verbose output clearer")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
---
tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
index 24997925ae00..dd84fed698a3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -1523,7 +1523,9 @@ int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
bool use_uncore_alias;
LIST_HEAD(config_terms);
- if (verbose > 1) {
+ pmu = parse_state->fake_pmu ?: perf_pmu__find(name);
+
+ if (verbose > 1 && !(pmu && pmu->selectable)) {
fprintf(stderr, "Attempting to add event pmu '%s' with '",
name);
if (head_config) {
@@ -1536,7 +1538,6 @@ int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
fprintf(stderr, "' that may result in non-fatal errors\n");
}
- pmu = parse_state->fake_pmu ?: perf_pmu__find(name);
if (!pmu) {
char *err_str;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists