[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220411013504.2517012-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 01:35:04 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: sean.wang@...iatek.com
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] drivers: dma: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c b/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c
index 375e7e647df6..64bad5681447 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c
@@ -274,11 +274,9 @@ static int mtk_uart_apdma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
unsigned int status;
int ret;
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(mtkd->ddev.dev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(chan->device->dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(mtkd->ddev.dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- }
mtk_uart_apdma_write(c, VFF_ADDR, 0);
mtk_uart_apdma_write(c, VFF_THRE, 0);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists