[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1091405.1649680508@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:35:08 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-cachefs@...hat.com, xiang@...nel.org,
chao@...nel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
willy@...radead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com, bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com,
tao.peng@...ux.alibaba.com, gerry@...ux.alibaba.com,
eguan@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
luodaowen.backend@...edance.com, tianzichen@...ishou.com,
fannaihao@...du.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/20] cachefiles: notify user daemon when withdrawing cookie
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> +static int init_close_req(struct cachefiles_req *req, void *private)
"cachefiles_" prefix please.
> + /*
> + * It's possible if the cookie looking up phase failed before READ
> + * request has ever been sent.
> + */
What "it" is possible? You might want to say "It's possible that the
cookie..."
> + if (fd == 0)
> + return -ENOENT;
0 is a valid fd.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists