linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:42:31 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ionela.Voinescu@....com,
        Lukasz.Luba@....com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
        Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, maz@...nel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency
 class information

On 07-04-22, 10:16, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> +static void cppc_cpufreq_register_em(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +	struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data;
> +	struct em_data_callback em_cb =
> +		EM_ADV_DATA_CB(cppc_get_cpu_power, cppc_get_cpu_cost);
> +
> +	if (!efficiency_class_populated)

Instead of a new variable for this, what about setting
cppc_cpufreq_driver.register_em = cppc_cpufreq_register_em, only if
you were able to populate the efficiency class in the first place ?

> +		return;
> +
> +	cpu_data = cppc_cpufreq_search_cpu_data(policy->cpu);
> +	em_dev_register_perf_domain(get_cpu_device(policy->cpu),
> +			get_perf_level_count(policy), &em_cb,
> +			cpu_data->shared_cpu_map, 0);
> +}
> +
>  #else
>  
>  static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_transition_delay_us(unsigned int cpu)
> @@ -471,6 +609,9 @@ static int populate_efficiency_class(void)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +static void cppc_cpufreq_register_em(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  
> @@ -742,6 +883,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = {
>  	.init = cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init,
>  	.exit = cppc_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
>  	.set_boost = cppc_cpufreq_set_boost,
> +	.register_em = cppc_cpufreq_register_em,
>  	.attr = cppc_cpufreq_attr,
>  	.name = "cppc_cpufreq",
>  };
> -- 
> 2.25.1

-- 
viresh