lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:04:08 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To:     Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@...il.com>
cc:     johan@...nel.org, elder@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: greybus: remove return in an empty void
 function



On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, Jaehee Park wrote:

> Issue found by checkpatch:
> WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful

Even for a simple change, it wouldbe better to follow the model that the
subject line should concisely orient the reader (eg "remove unneeded
return") and the log message should give a more complete description.
Simply repeating what checkpatch tells you is rarely a good idea.  It says
what the problem is in a general way, whereas you should be explaining the
reasoning behind your fix in a specific case.  Here you could say that an
empty function with void return type does not need an explicit return, and
that the problem was detected with checkpatch.

julia

>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
> index 0f50d1e51e2c..3e3a16568def 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
> @@ -1032,7 +1032,6 @@ static int gbcodec_probe(struct snd_soc_component *comp)
>  static void gbcodec_remove(struct snd_soc_component *comp)
>  {
>  	/* Empty function for now */
> -	return;
>  }
>
>  static int gbcodec_write(struct snd_soc_component *comp, unsigned int reg,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ