linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] staging: greybus: fix warnings reported by checkpatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Apr 2022 20:55:14 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
To:     Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@...il.com>, johan@...nel.org
Cc:     elder@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] staging: greybus: fix warnings reported by checkpatch

On 4/11/22 8:50 PM, Jaehee Park wrote:
> The first patch corrects a typo in a comment. The second patch fixes
> 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning.
> 
> Jaehee Park (2):
>    staging: greybus: correct typo in comment 'Atleast' to 'At least'
>    staging: greybus: remove return in an empty void function
> 
>   drivers/staging/greybus/arche-apb-ctrl.c | 2 +-
>   drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c    | 1 -
>   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

These are really trivial patches.  Whether the second
one is even worth changing is questionable (it represents
"code churn" without really adding value).

That said, you've properly submitted the patches and I
have no problem with either one.  So someone else can
object, but if they do not:

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>