[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f80c1fa-9e2d-a205-08ba-d85f126d18ff@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:29:48 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
david@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, yaozhenguo1@...il.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, liuyuntao10@...wei.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] hugetlb: Fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes
On 4/13/2022 11:29 AM, Peng Liu wrote:
> Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes. In
> this case, nr_online_nodes can not be used to walk through numa node.
> Also, a valid node may be greater than nr_online_nodes.
>
> However, in hugetlb, it is assumed that nodes are contiguous. Recheck
> all the places that use nr_online_nodes, and repair them one by one.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Fixes: 4178158ef8ca ("hugetlbfs: fix issue of preallocation of gigantic pages can't work")
> Fixes: b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
> Fixes: e79ce9832316 ("hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter")
> Fixes: f9317f77a6e0 ("hugetlb: clean up potential spectre issue warnings")
> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists