[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fcfe3a03-933f-6dd7-2059-df83b1d18943@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:39:42 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
david@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, yaozhenguo1@...il.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, liuyuntao10@...wei.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] hugetlb: Fix return value of __setup handlers
On 4/13/2022 11:29 AM, Peng Liu wrote:
> When __setup() return '0', using invalid option values causes the
> entire kernel boot option string to be reported as Unknown. Hugetlb
> calls __setup() and will return '0' when set invalid parameter
> string.
>
> The following phenomenon is observed:
> cmdline:
> hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1
> dmesg:
> HugeTLB: unsupported hugepagesz=1Y
> HugeTLB: hugepages=1 does not follow a valid hugepagesz, ignoring
> Unknown kernel command line parameters "hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1"
>
> Since hugetlb will print warning/error information before return for
> invalid parameter string, just use return '1' to avoid print again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists