[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38078438-dbce-690b-ba79-5c3713f97816@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:14:00 +0100
From: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: Set PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit for Arm SPE
event
On 13/04/2022 09:49, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:15:40AM +0100, German Gomez wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__MEMORY) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * FIXUP: prior to kernel 5.18, Arm SPE missed to set
>>> + * PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit in sample type. For backward
>>> + * compatibility, set the bit if it's an old perf data file.
>>> + */
>>> + evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, evsel) {
>>> + if (strstr(evsel->name, "arm_spe_") &&
>> This didn't work for me when the file recorded "-e arm_spe//" instead of
>> "-e arm_spe_0//". Could you remove the trailing _? With that:
> Sure, will change to "arm_spe". Just curious, if there any local
> change at your side so we have the different event name?
No local changes. I've always used "arm_spe//" and it always defaults to
"arm_spe_0//". But it's still stored as the former in the data file. I
haven't checked where this default happens though. Isn't it the same for
you?
Thanks,
German
>
>> Tested-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
> Thanks a lot, German!
>
> Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists