[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220413091604.GD521036@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:16:04 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: Set PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit for Arm SPE
event
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:14:00AM +0100, German Gomez wrote:
>
> On 13/04/2022 09:49, Leo Yan wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:15:40AM +0100, German Gomez wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__MEMORY) {
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * FIXUP: prior to kernel 5.18, Arm SPE missed to set
> >>> + * PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit in sample type. For backward
> >>> + * compatibility, set the bit if it's an old perf data file.
> >>> + */
> >>> + evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, evsel) {
> >>> + if (strstr(evsel->name, "arm_spe_") &&
> >> This didn't work for me when the file recorded "-e arm_spe//" instead of
> >> "-e arm_spe_0//". Could you remove the trailing _? With that:
> > Sure, will change to "arm_spe". Just curious, if there any local
> > change at your side so we have the different event name?
>
> No local changes. I've always used "arm_spe//" and it always defaults to
> "arm_spe_0//". But it's still stored as the former in the data file. I
> haven't checked where this default happens though. Isn't it the same for
> you?
Yeah, this is same with me. Thanks for explanation.
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists