| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:27:31 +0530
From: "Sandeep Maheswaram (Temp)" <quic_c_sanm@...cinc.com>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
CC: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>, <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>,
<quic_vpulyala@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/6] usb: dwc3: core: Host wake up support from system
suspend
Hi Matthias,
On 4/13/2022 9:26 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 02:38:33PM +0530, Sandeep Maheswaram (Temp) wrote:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> On 4/13/2022 12:35 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:08:02PM +0530, Sandeep Maheswaram (Temp) wrote:
>>>> Hi Pavan,
>>>>
>>>> On 4/12/2022 10:30 AM, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
>>>>> Hi Sandeep,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:16:39AM +0530, Sandeep Maheswaram (Temp) wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/12/2022 2:24 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:46:50AM +0530, Sandeep Maheswaram wrote:
>>>>>>>> During suspend read the status of all port and set hs phy mode
>>>>>>>> based on current speed. Use this hs phy mode to configure wakeup
>>>>>>>> interrupts in qcom glue driver.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Check wakep-source property for dwc3 core node to set the
>>>>>>> s/wakep/wakeup/
>>>>>> Okay. Will update in next version.
>>>>>>>> wakeup capability. Drop the device_init_wakeup call from
>>>>>>>> runtime suspend and resume.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also check during suspend if any wakeup capable devices are
>>>>>>>> connected to the controller (directly or through hubs), if there
>>>>>>>> are none set a flag to indicate that the PHY is powered
>>>>>>>> down during suspend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Maheswaram <quic_c_sanm@...cinc.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> A per-patch change log would be really helpful for reviewers, even
>>>>>>> if it doesn't include older versions.
>>>>>> Okay. Will update in next version.
>>>>>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>>>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h | 4 ++++
>>>>>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/host.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>>>>>>> index 1170b80..effaa43 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>>>>>>>> #include <linux/usb/gadget.h>
>>>>>>>> #include <linux/usb/of.h>
>>>>>>>> #include <linux/usb/otg.h>
>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/usb/hcd.h>
>>>>>>>> #include "core.h"
>>>>>>>> #include "gadget.h"
>>>>>>>> @@ -1723,6 +1724,7 @@ static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dwc);
>>>>>>>> dwc3_cache_hwparams(dwc);
>>>>>>>> + device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "wakeup-source"));
>>>>>>>> spin_lock_init(&dwc->lock);
>>>>>>>> mutex_init(&dwc->mutex);
>>>>>>>> @@ -1865,6 +1867,7 @@ static int dwc3_suspend_common(struct dwc3 *dwc, pm_message_t msg)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>>>>>> u32 reg;
>>>>>>>> + struct usb_hcd *hcd = platform_get_drvdata(dwc->xhci);
>>>>>>>> switch (dwc->current_dr_role) {
>>>>>>>> case DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_DEVICE:
>>>>>>>> @@ -1877,10 +1880,7 @@ static int dwc3_suspend_common(struct dwc3 *dwc, pm_message_t msg)
>>>>>>>> dwc3_core_exit(dwc);
>>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>>> case DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_HOST:
>>>>>>>> - if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg)) {
>>>>>>>> - dwc3_core_exit(dwc);
>>>>>>>> - break;
>>>>>>>> - }
>>>>>>>> + dwc3_check_phy_speed_mode(dwc);
>>>>>>>> /* Let controller to suspend HSPHY before PHY driver suspends */
>>>>>>>> if (dwc->dis_u2_susphy_quirk ||
>>>>>>>> @@ -1896,6 +1896,16 @@ static int dwc3_suspend_common(struct dwc3 *dwc, pm_message_t msg)
>>>>>>>> phy_pm_runtime_put_sync(dwc->usb2_generic_phy);
>>>>>>>> phy_pm_runtime_put_sync(dwc->usb3_generic_phy);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg)) {
>>>>>>>> + if (device_may_wakeup(dwc->dev) &&
>>>>>>>> + usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants(hcd->self.root_hub)) {
>>>>>>> You did not answer my question on v12, reposting it:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did you ever try whether you could use device_children_wakeup_capable() from
>>>>>>> [1] instead of usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants()?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-usb/patch/1635753224-23975-2-git-send-email-quic_c_sanm@quicinc.com/#24566065
>>>>>> Sorry ..I have replied in mail yesterday but it is not showing up in
>>>>>> patchwork link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tried with device_children_wakeup_capable(dwc->dev) instead of
>>>>>> usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants and it always returns true even
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when no devices are connected.
>>>>>>
>>>>> What do you mean by when no devices are connected? There is always
>>>>> root hub connected and we should not power down the DWC3 here even
>>>>> when remote wakeup for root hub is enabled. Essentially
>>>>> usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants() returns true even without any
>>>>> physical devices connected.
>>>>>
>>>>> What does device_children_wakeup_capable() do? Sorry, I could not
>>>>> find this function definition.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Pavan
>>>> usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants() doesn't consider hubs. It only returns true if any devices
>>>> are connected with wakeup capability apart from hubs.
>>> Actually it considers hubs:
>>>
>>> unsigned usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants(struct usb_device *udev)
>>> {
>>> struct usb_hub *hub = usb_hub_to_struct_hub(udev);
>>>
>>> return udev->do_remote_wakeup +
>>> (hub ? hub->wakeup_enabled_descendants : 0);
>>> }
>>>
>>> 'udev' may or may not be a hub, if 'do_remote_wakeup' is set then the
>>> device is considered a wakeup enabled descendant.
>>>
>>> And for system suspebd 'do_remote_wakeup' is set based on the wakeup
>>> config of the device:
>>>
>>> static void choose_wakeup(struct usb_device *udev, pm_message_t msg)
>>> {
>>> ...
>>> w = device_may_wakeup(&udev->dev);
>>> ...
>>> udev->do_remote_wakeup = w;
>>> }
>>>
>>> I checked on three systems with different Linux distributions, on all of
>>> the wakeup flag of a connected hub is 'disabled'. Wakeup still works, so
>>> apparently that flag doesn't really have an impact for child ports.
>>>
>>>> If we consider hubs also dwc3 core exit and phy exit will never be called.
>>>>
>>>> device_children_wakeup_capable() implementation was shared by Matthias in below thread
>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-usb/patch/1635753224-23975-2-git-send-email-quic_c_sanm@quicinc.com/#24566065
>>>>
>>>> Probably device_children_wakeup_capable() is returning true because it considers hubs also.
>>> I thought I did a basic test when I sent the patch, I did another (?) one
>>> with v13 of your patch set. In this tests with a hub connected the
>>> function returns true when an HID device is connected, and false when
>>> nothing is connected. The wakeup flag of the hub is disabled (default).
>>>
>>> Sandeep, are the wakeup flags of the child hub(s) set to 'enabled' on
>>> the system you tested on?
>> The wakeup flags of hub is 'disabled' on system I tested.
>>
>> What is the input param you are giving to device_children_wakeup_capable() function ?
> I passed '&hcd->self.root_hub->dev'
Thanks. It is working with this change device_children_wakeup_capable
(&hcd->self.root_hub->dev).
But I am not sure if it is better than usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants.
Still we are accessing xhci layer
from dwc which Felipe suggested to avoid.
>
>> I was passing the dwc->dev like this device_children_wakeup_capable(dwc->dev) .Is it right?
> The DWC doesn't know anything about the connected USB devices, so this only
> checks wakeup capability/policy of the DWC itself.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists