linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] interconnect: qcom: sc7180: Drop IP0 interconnects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 19:59:37 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] interconnect: qcom: sc7180: Drop IP0 interconnects

On 4/13/22 6:14 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Stephen, I think you should re-spin the series and add the
>> proper change to the binding.  You can keep the tags I gave
>> before.
> I will not combine the removal of the binding from this patch. This
> patch is good as is and fixes the problem while ignoring the DT binding
> and that larger discussion.

OK, and I concur it's better to make the change in the kernel only,
without changing the DTB.  It doesn't hurt to permit (define) those
other definitions in the binding, even if we agree to never use them.

					-Alex