lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 12:07:51 -0700
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] objtool: Extricate ibt from stack validation

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 09:01:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/putuser.S b/arch/x86/lib/putuser.S
> > index ecb2049c1273..b7dfd60243b7 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/putuser.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/putuser.S
> > @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__put_user_1)
> >  	cmp %_ASM_BX,%_ASM_CX
> >  	jae .Lbad_put_user
> >  SYM_INNER_LABEL(__put_user_nocheck_1, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> > +	ENDBR
> >  	ASM_STAC
> >  1:	movb %al,(%_ASM_CX)
> >  	xor %ecx,%ecx
> > @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__put_user_2)
> >  	cmp %_ASM_BX,%_ASM_CX
> >  	jae .Lbad_put_user
> >  SYM_INNER_LABEL(__put_user_nocheck_2, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> > +	ENDBR
> >  	ASM_STAC
> >  2:	movw %ax,(%_ASM_CX)
> >  	xor %ecx,%ecx
> > @@ -76,6 +78,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__put_user_4)
> >  	cmp %_ASM_BX,%_ASM_CX
> >  	jae .Lbad_put_user
> >  SYM_INNER_LABEL(__put_user_nocheck_4, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> > +	ENDBR
> >  	ASM_STAC
> >  3:	movl %eax,(%_ASM_CX)
> >  	xor %ecx,%ecx
> > @@ -90,6 +93,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__put_user_8)
> >  	cmp %_ASM_BX,%_ASM_CX
> >  	jae .Lbad_put_user
> >  SYM_INNER_LABEL(__put_user_nocheck_8, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> > +	ENDBR
> >  	ASM_STAC
> >  4:	mov %_ASM_AX,(%_ASM_CX)
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> 
> Hmm, how did those go missing?

Because the current code only warns about references from .data/.rodata.
This patch changes that.

> > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
> > index 5f87bab4fb8d..b2b2366885a2 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
> > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> >  	.align RETPOLINE_THUNK_SIZE
> >  SYM_INNER_LABEL(__x86_indirect_thunk_\reg, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> >  	UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
> > +	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
> >  
> >  	ALTERNATIVE_2 __stringify(ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE; jmp *%\reg), \
> >  		      __stringify(RETPOLINE \reg), X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE, \
> > @@ -55,7 +56,6 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__x86_indirect_thunk_\reg, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> >  
> >  	.align RETPOLINE_THUNK_SIZE
> >  SYM_CODE_START(__x86_indirect_thunk_array)
> > -	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR // apply_retpolines
> >  
> >  #define GEN(reg) THUNK reg
> >  #include <asm/GEN-for-each-reg.h>
> 
> Hmm, where does that come from? Do you have commit be8a096521ca
> ("x86,bpf: Avoid IBT objtool warning")?

Same answer as above, this patch now warns about exported symbols with
missing ENDBR.

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ