[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <207d6171-173a-3d77-4b13-ea6f7476478d@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 00:41:36 +0530
From: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Basavaraj.Natikar@....com, Richard.Gong@....com,
stable@...r.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
On 14/04/22 08:27, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> commit 5467801f1fcb ("gpio: Restrict usage of GPIO chip irq members before
> initialization") attempted to fix a race condition that lead to a NULL
> pointer, but in the process caused a regression for _AEI/_EVT declared
> GPIOs. This manifests in messages showing deferred probing while trying
> to allocate IRQs like so:
>
> [ 0.688318] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x0000 to IRQ, err -517
> [ 0.688337] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x002C to IRQ, err -517
> [ 0.688348] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x003D to IRQ, err -517
> [ 0.688359] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x003E to IRQ, err -517
> [ 0.688369] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x003A to IRQ, err -517
> [ 0.688379] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x003B to IRQ, err -517
> [ 0.688389] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x0002 to IRQ, err -517
> [ 0.688399] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x0011 to IRQ, err -517
> [ 0.688410] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x0012 to IRQ, err -517
> [ 0.688420] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x0007 to IRQ, err -517
>
> The code for walking _AEI doesn't handle deferred probing and so this leads
> to non-functional GPIO interrupts.
>
> Fix this issue by moving the call to `acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts` to
> occur after gc->irc.initialized is set.
Thanks Mario for sending a fix for this issue, I didn't realize
gpiod_to_irq() was also
being called through acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts().
Change looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>
> Cc: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 5467801f1fcb ("gpio: Restrict usage of GPIO chip irq members before initialization")
> Reported-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/BL1PR12MB51577A77F000A008AA694675E2EF9@BL1PR12MB5157.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/T/#u
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 085348e08986..b7694171655c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1601,8 +1601,6 @@ static int gpiochip_add_irqchip(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>
> gpiochip_set_irq_hooks(gc);
>
> - acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(gc);
> -
> /*
> * Using barrier() here to prevent compiler from reordering
> * gc->irq.initialized before initialization of above
> @@ -1612,6 +1610,8 @@ static int gpiochip_add_irqchip(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>
> gc->irq.initialized = true;
>
> + acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(gc);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists