lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 23:03:33 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>
Cc:     quic_kalyant <quic_kalyant@...cinc.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        quic_vproddut <quic_vproddut@...cinc.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Aravind Venkateswaran <quic_aravindh@...cinc.com>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for the eDP panel over
 aux_bus

On 14/04/2022 23:00, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> Hi Dmitry
> 
> On 4/14/2022 12:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31)
>>> On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
>>>> <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus.
>>>>>
>>>>> These changes are dependent on the following series:
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=* 
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series.
>>>> What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not
>>>> Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If not,
>>>> maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course)
>>>> at the beginning of your series?
>>>
>>> No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are marked as
>>> 'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree.
>>> It would be better to point to the correct patchwork:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/
>>>
>>> Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway,
>>> basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also be 
>>> good.
>>>
>>
>> Can you resend those as not RFC?
> 
> Yes, please resend these, I can ack them.
> 
> Previously I held off my ack, as kuogee ran into some issues testing 
> them which was later concluded to be a mismatch in QC internal trees due 
> to different versions of the changes.( another reason why we should get 
> these landed ).
> 
> Now, that Sankeerth has tested these, if you can remove RFC and post 
> them, I can ack the.

Well, you can ack those patches without them being resent. You have 
already added your Reviewed-by to first three patches (which were merged 
during last window).


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ