[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOUHufYmEYa4c7v4ATv+cHKu7uN7Lx7agMwWyPERyfMxDyFwoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:14:55 -0600
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michael Larabel <Michael@...haellarabel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Page Reclaim v2 <page-reclaim@...gle.com>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>,
Jan Alexander Steffens <heftig@...hlinux.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Steven Barrett <steven@...uorix.net>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Daniel Byrne <djbyrne@....edu>,
Donald Carr <d@...os-reins.com>,
Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@...dex.ru>,
Shuang Zhai <szhai2@...rochester.edu>,
Sofia Trinh <sofia.trinh@....works>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: minimal implementation
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:40 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:36:03 -0600 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > > or it is only something
> > > meaningful for the internal code?
> >
> > This is how swappiness is interpreted.
> >
> > > if so, can we rename it to
> > > something else? otherwise, it is quite confusing.
> >
> > Feel free to suggest something.
>
> It is confusing, swap_preference?
It's still largely swappiness -- the original swappiness is twisted a
bit around the corners (0, 1 and 200) to make it more suitable for
internal use.
I vote for __swappiness or lrugen_swappiness, which look ugly to me
but it captures what this variable actually is, i.e., an overridden
version of the original swappiness. And similar for lru_gen_mm_walk
*walk vs mm_walk *walk.
In other languages where polymorphism is supported, there are
established naming conversions. In this patchset, I just used the same
variable name when two things are closely related but distinguishable
from the _contexts_ they are used.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists