linux-kernel - Re: Plumbers conf presentation on -fanalyze?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:13:32 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     David Malcolm <dmalcolm@...hat.com>,
        James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@....org>,
        clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Plumbers conf presentation on -fanalyze?

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:08 PM David Malcolm <dmalcolm@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 14:42 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Hi David,
> > Jose and I are currently in the planning process to put together a
> > Kernel+Toolchain microconference track at Linux Plumbers Conference
> > this year (Sept 12-14) in Dublin, Ireland.
> >
> > We had seen
> > https://developers.redhat.com/articles/2022/04/12/state-static-analysis-gcc-12-compiler#scaling_up_the_analyzer
> > particularly the section on The Linux kernel and were wondering if
> > you'd be interested in presenting more information about -fanalyze to
> > kernel and toolchain developers there?
>
> Thanks!  I'm very much interested, but am not yet sure about travel
> (both in terms of (a) budget and (b) possible new virus strains).  Is
> this conference going to be purely in-person, or hybrid virtual/in-
> person?

I didn't see an answer to that question on
https://lpc.events/event/16/page/185-faqs.
cc' James + Stephen who might be able to answer that more precisely
than I could.
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers