linux-kernel - Re: Plumbers conf presentation on -fanalyze?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3119c35ba1fa7247e87d7acb56e85ea99092d0a4.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:30:24 -0400
From:   James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        David Malcolm <dmalcolm@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@....org>,
        clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Plumbers conf presentation on -fanalyze?

On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 15:13 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:08 PM David Malcolm <dmalcolm@...hat.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 14:42 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > Hi David,
> > > Jose and I are currently in the planning process to put together
> > > a
> > > Kernel+Toolchain microconference track at Linux Plumbers
> > > Conference
> > > this year (Sept 12-14) in Dublin, Ireland.
> > > 
> > > We had seen
> > > https://developers.redhat.com/articles/2022/04/12/state-static-analysis-gcc-12-compiler#scaling_up_the_analyzer
> > > particularly the section on The Linux kernel and were wondering
> > > if
> > > you'd be interested in presenting more information about
> > > -fanalyze to
> > > kernel and toolchain developers there?
> > 
> > Thanks!  I'm very much interested, but am not yet sure about travel
> > (both in terms of (a) budget and (b) possible new virus
> > strains).  Is
> > this conference going to be purely in-person, or hybrid virtual/in-
> > person?
> 
> I didn't see an answer to that question on
> https://lpc.events/event/16/page/185-faqs.
> cc' James + Stephen who might be able to answer that more precisely
> than I could.

It's going to be hybrid ... I thought we actually managed to announce
that but forgot to put it on the front page.  However, there is a
caveat: to minimize the risk of technical issues, we'd very much like
the content producers (speakers etc) to be in person.  This won't be a
blanket requirement but we'll be unhappy if you try to have a MC with
mostly virtual speakers for instance.

Jaems