[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220416103526.3287348-1-liupeng256@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 10:35:26 +0000
From: Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>
To: <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, <david@...hat.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <yaozhenguo1@...il.com>,
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
<liuyuntao10@...wei.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
<dave@...olabs.net>, <liupeng256@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] hugetlb: Fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes
Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes. In
this case, nr_online_nodes can not be used to walk through numa node.
Also, a valid node may be greater than nr_online_nodes.
However, in hugetlb, it is assumed that nodes are contiguous. Recheck
all the places that use nr_online_nodes, and repair them one by one.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Fixes: 4178158ef8ca ("hugetlbfs: fix issue of preallocation of gigantic pages can't work")
Fixes: b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
Fixes: e79ce9832316 ("hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter")
Fixes: f9317f77a6e0 ("hugetlb: clean up potential spectre issue warnings")
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>
---
v3->v4:
Make sure nid is valid before use node_online, and __alloc_bootmem_huge_page
is no need to check node_online, which is suggested by Kefeng.
mm/hugetlb.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index b34f50156f7e..a386c5f94932 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2979,8 +2979,6 @@ int __alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
struct huge_bootmem_page *m = NULL; /* initialize for clang */
int nr_nodes, node;
- if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE && nid >= nr_online_nodes)
- return 0;
/* do node specific alloc */
if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
m = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h),
@@ -3088,7 +3086,7 @@ static void __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages(struct hstate *h)
}
/* do node specific alloc */
- for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++) {
+ for_each_online_node(i) {
if (h->max_huge_pages_node[i] > 0) {
hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_onenode(h, i);
node_specific_alloc = true;
@@ -4049,7 +4047,7 @@ static int __init hugetlb_init(void)
default_hstate.max_huge_pages =
default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++)
+ for_each_online_node(i)
default_hstate.max_huge_pages_node[i] =
default_hugepages_in_node[i];
}
@@ -4164,9 +4162,9 @@ static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
pr_warn("HugeTLB: architecture can't support node specific alloc, ignoring!\n");
return 0;
}
- if (tmp >= nr_online_nodes)
+ if (tmp >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(tmp))
goto invalid;
- node = array_index_nospec(tmp, nr_online_nodes);
+ node = array_index_nospec(tmp, MAX_NUMNODES);
p += count + 1;
/* Parse hugepages */
if (sscanf(p, "%lu%n", &tmp, &count) != 1)
@@ -4294,7 +4292,7 @@ static int __init default_hugepagesz_setup(char *s)
*/
if (default_hstate_max_huge_pages) {
default_hstate.max_huge_pages = default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++)
+ for_each_online_node(i)
default_hstate.max_huge_pages_node[i] =
default_hugepages_in_node[i];
if (hstate_is_gigantic(&default_hstate))
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists