linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: afe: rescale: Make use of device properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 16 Apr 2022 11:41:50 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: afe: rescale: Make use of device properties

On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 10:47:23 -0400
Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 08:03:59PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:32:38AM -0400, Liam Beguin wrote:  
> > > Hi Andy,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:01:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:  
> > > > Convert the module to be property provider agnostic and allow
> > > > it to be used on non-OF platforms.  
> >   
> > > > +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>  
> > > 
> > > Is this really needed?  
> > 
> > Yes.
> > This header is missed. I can split its addition to a separate patch.  
> 
> Understood, maybe a separate patch would make it more explicit.

You could also argue that the main route people 'expect' that header via
is of.h and given that include is dropped in this patch, we have even more reason
mod_devicetable.h should be included.

So I'm fine with this in one patch on that basis.

Also I'm lazy and not having to go to v2 on this saves me a little bit of effort :)

Hence applied.


Jonathan

> 
> Cheers,
> Liam
> 
> > > device_get_match_data() is already defined in <linux/property.h>  
> > 
> > It's indirectly related (just like we do when we clean up of.h). Since
> > the original of.h is missed there is no header replacement, just adding.
> > 
> > -- 
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> > 
> >