linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] EDAC/dmc520: Don't print an error for each unconfigured interrupt line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:40:29 -0500
From:   Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Lei Wang <lewan@...rosoft.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>,
        Shiping Ji <shiping.linux@...il.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC/dmc520: Don't print an error for each unconfigured
 interrupt line

On 2022-04-04 16:56:58, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 2022-01-19 11:28:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:37:51AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:17:52AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > For this specific change, I do NOT think it should be backported at all,
> > > > mostly for the reason that people are still arguing over the whole
> > > > platform_get_*_optional() mess that we currently have.  Let's not go and
> > > > backport anything right now to stable trees until we have all of that
> > > > sorted out, as it looks like it all might be changing again.  See:
> > > > 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220110195449.12448-1-s.shtylyov@omp.ru
> > > > for all of the gory details and the 300+ emails written on the topic so
> > > > far.
> > > 
> > > It sounds to me I should not even take this patch upstream yet,
> > > considering that's still ongoing...
> > 
> > Yes, I would not take that just yet at all.  Let's let the api argument
> > settle down a bit first.
> 
> The API argument seems to have fizzled out in v2:
> 
>  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220212201631.12648-1-s.shtylyov@omp.ru/
> 
> Can this fix be merged since there seem to be no API changes coming
> soon? Boris, feel free to strip off the cc stable tag.

Hi Boris - I just double checked that this still looks correct and
applies cleanly to linux-next. Anything I can do on my end to help get
this little fix merged into the ras.git tree? Thanks!

Tyler

> 
> Tyler
> 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> >