[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yl3eisj26sHBjokV@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:56:26 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf report: Set PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit for Arm SPE
event
Em Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 08:32:01PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> Since commit bb30acae4c4d ("perf report: Bail out --mem-mode if mem info
> is not available") "perf mem report" and "perf report --mem-mode"
> don't report result if the PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit is missed in sample
> type.
>
> The commit ffab48705205 ("perf: arm-spe: Fix perf report --mem-mode")
> partially fixes the issue. It adds PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit for Arm SPE
> event, this allows the perf data file generated by kernel v5.18-rc1 or
> later version can be reported properly.
>
> On the other hand, perf tool still fails to be backward compatibility
> for a data file recorded by an older version's perf which contains Arm
> SPE trace data. This patch is a workaround in reporting phase, when
> detects ARM SPE PMU event and without PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit, it will
> force to set the bit in the sample type and give a warning info.
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
> Fixes: bb30acae4c4d ("perf report: Bail out --mem-mode if mem info is not available")
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> Tested-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
> ---
> v3: Remove warning log, add James' review tag.
> v2: Change event name from "arm_spe_" to "arm_spe";
> Add German's test tag.
>
> tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> index 1ad75c7ba074..afe4a5539ecc 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> @@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ static int report__setup_sample_type(struct report *rep)
> struct perf_session *session = rep->session;
> u64 sample_type = evlist__combined_sample_type(session->evlist);
> bool is_pipe = perf_data__is_pipe(session->data);
> + struct evsel *evsel;
>
> if (session->itrace_synth_opts->callchain ||
> session->itrace_synth_opts->add_callchain ||
> @@ -407,6 +408,19 @@ static int report__setup_sample_type(struct report *rep)
> }
>
> if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__MEMORY) {
> + /*
> + * FIXUP: prior to kernel 5.18, Arm SPE missed to set
> + * PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit in sample type. For backward
> + * compatibility, set the bit if it's an old perf data file.
> + */
> + evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, evsel) {
> + if (strstr(evsel->name, "arm_spe") &&
> + !(sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC)) {
> + evsel->core.attr.sample_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC;
> + sample_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (!is_pipe && !(sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC)) {
> ui__error("Selected --mem-mode but no mem data. "
> "Did you call perf record without -d?\n");
> --
> 2.25.1
--
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists