[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n5366tn28yBYXj+7gaKGWqx4pCTrQ-nPWiEvTOERS9R6uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 16:41:40 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: Add peripheral
charger count API
Quoting Prashant Malani (2022-04-18 16:31:57)
> On Apr 18 16:29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Prashant Malani (2022-04-18 16:21:52)
> > > On Apr 18 16:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sure. I take it that I can drop this function entirely then?
> > >
> > > Yeah, if it's a simple response, should be fine.
> > >
> > > > BTW, why is
> > > > that function name the same as a struct name? It confuses my ctags.
> > >
> > > Yeahhh, didn't think about ctags... :/
> > > Topic for another series: probably can be renamed to cros_ec_cmd() (just to keep ctags happy) ?
> > >
> >
> > But then there'll be two cros_ec_cmd() because there's a
> > cros-ec-regulator. Fun! :)
>
> Ugh :S
>
> I think we can get rid of that one; it looks to be the same as this
> one :)
>
>
> I'll write up a cleanup series if it all looks OK.
>
Cool thanks! Would be useful to change those insize and outsize sizes to
size_t as well. Please Cc me on the series. I'll resend this series with
cros_ec_command() shortly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists