[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220418110635.2559391-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:06:35 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: robh@...nel.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] tty: serdev: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/tty/serdev/core.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
index 0180e1e4e75d..e550ad3e7f2b 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
@@ -156,11 +156,9 @@ int serdev_device_open(struct serdev_device *serdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&ctrl->dev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(&ctrl->dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&ctrl->dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
goto err_close;
- }
return 0;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists