[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220418110716.2559453-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:07:16 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
kernel/irq/chip.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index 54af0deb239b..8ddcb8e883d7 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -1576,11 +1576,9 @@ int irq_chip_pm_get(struct irq_data *data)
int retval;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM) && dev) {
- retval = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
- if (retval < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
+ retval = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
+ if (retval < 0)
return retval;
- }
}
return 0;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists