[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfcxACmuw5pwPgSB9ud06hWtHCUrMifU1rZJ+h+dwG+bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:38:24 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
Cc: "brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"fancer.lancer@...il.com" <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
"hoan@...amperecomputing.com" <hoan@...amperecomputing.com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"opendmb@...il.com" <opendmb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 6:07 AM Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com> wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> writes:
...
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> > include/linux/gpio/driver.h | 2 +-
> >
> > You can’t do it for one driver only. As I told it will require too much of additional churn to make this to be series.
> >
>
> It seems I have misunderstood your "too much of additional churn". Can
> you explain it?
> The gpio-mmio.c and driver.h here are the basics of other gpio
> drivers. In my opinion, these two files
> belong to the basic code of gpio, and functions such as bgpio_init are
> declared in
> include/linux/gpio/driver.h and implemented in
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c. So there is no churn.
When you change the member of the data structure, you have to change
all its users. You can't change only one at a time because it will be
a (compile-time) bisectability issue.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists