Message-Id: <20220419020011.65995-1-jon@nutanix.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 22:00:08 -0400
From:   Jon Kohler <jon@...anix.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Jon Kohler <jon@...anix.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Balbir Singh <sblbir@...zon.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/speculation, KVM: only IBPB for switch_mm_always_ibpb on vCPU load

On vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs and svm_vcpu_load, respect user controlled
configuration for conditional IBPB and only attempt IBPB MSR when
switching between different guest vCPUs IFF switch_mm_always_ibpb,
which fixes a situation where the kernel will issue IBPB
unconditionally even when conditional IBPB is enabled.

If a user has spectre_v2_user mitigation enabled, in any
configuration, and the underlying processor supports X86_FEATURE_IBPB,
X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB is set and any calls to
indirect_branch_prediction_barrier() will issue IBPB MSR.

Depending on the spectre_v2_user configuration, either
switch_mm_always_ibpb key or switch_mm_cond_ibpb key will be set.

Both switch_mm_always_ibpb and switch_mm_cond_ibpb are handled by
switch_mm() -> cond_mitigation(), which works well in cases where
switching vCPUs (i.e. switching tasks) also switches mm_struct;
however, this misses a paranoid case where user space may be running
multiple guests in a single process (i.e. single mm_struct).

This paranoid case is already covered by vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs and
svm_vcpu_load; however, this is done by calling
indirect_branch_prediction_barrier() and thus the kernel
unconditionally issues IBPB if X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB is set.

Fix by using intermediary call to x86_virt_guest_switch_ibpb(), which
gates IBPB MSR IFF switch_mm_always_ibpb is true. This is useful for
security paranoid VMMs in either single process or multi-process VMM
configurations.

switch_mm_always_ibpb key is user controlled via spectre_v2_user and
will be true for the following configurations:
  spectre_v2_user=on
  spectre_v2_user=prctl,ibpb
  spectre_v2_user=seccomp,ibpb

Signed-off-by: Jon Kohler <jon@...anix.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
 - Addressed comments on approach from Sean.

 arch/x86/include/asm/spec-ctrl.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c       |  6 +++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c           |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c           |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spec-ctrl.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spec-ctrl.h
index 5393babc0598..1ad140b17ad7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spec-ctrl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spec-ctrl.h
@@ -85,4 +85,19 @@ static inline void speculative_store_bypass_ht_init(void) { }
 extern void speculation_ctrl_update(unsigned long tif);
 extern void speculation_ctrl_update_current(void);

+/*
+ * Issue IBPB when switching guest vCPUs IFF if switch_mm_always_ibpb.
+ * Primarily useful for security paranoid (or naive) user space VMMs
+ * that may run multiple VMs within a single process.
+ * For multi-process VMMs, switching vCPUs, i.e. switching tasks,
+ * will also switch mm_structs and thus do IPBP via cond_mitigation();
+ * however, in the always_ibpb case, take a paranoid approach and issue
+ * IBPB on both switch_mm() and vCPU switch.
+ */
+static inline void x86_virt_guest_switch_ibpb(void)
+{
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&switch_mm_always_ibpb))
+		indirect_branch_prediction_barrier();
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 6296e1ebed1d..6aafb0279cbc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -68,8 +68,12 @@ u64 __ro_after_init x86_amd_ls_cfg_ssbd_mask;
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(switch_to_cond_stibp);
 /* Control conditional IBPB in switch_mm() */
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(switch_mm_cond_ibpb);
-/* Control unconditional IBPB in switch_mm() */
+/* Control unconditional IBPB in both switch_mm() and
+ * x86_virt_guest_switch_ibpb().
+ * See notes on x86_virt_guest_switch_ibpb() for KVM use case details.
+ */
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(switch_mm_always_ibpb);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(switch_mm_always_ibpb);

 /* Control MDS CPU buffer clear before returning to user space */
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mds_user_clear);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index bd4c64b362d2..fc08c94df888 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -1302,7 +1302,7 @@ static void svm_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)

 	if (sd->current_vmcb != svm->vmcb) {
 		sd->current_vmcb = svm->vmcb;
-		indirect_branch_prediction_barrier();
+		x86_virt_guest_switch_ibpb();
 	}
 	if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
 		__avic_vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 04d170c4b61e..a8eed9b8221b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ void vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu,
 		 * The L1 VMM can protect itself with retpolines, IBPB or IBRS.
 		 */
 		if (!buddy || WARN_ON_ONCE(buddy->vmcs != prev))
-			indirect_branch_prediction_barrier();
+			x86_virt_guest_switch_ibpb();
 	}

 	if (!already_loaded) {
--
2.30.1 (Apple Git-130)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists