[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07d7fa69-dd2f-3e10-f959-474814105d3b@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:54:55 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: LABBE Corentin <clabbe@...libre.com>
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 24/33] dt-bindings: crypto: convert rockchip-crypto to
YAML
On 19/04/2022 13:09, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>> This is not needed and dt_bindings_check should complain.
>>
>>> + items:
>>> + const: aclk
>>> + const: hclk
>>> + const: sclk
>>> + const: apb_pclk
>>> +
>>> + resets:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + reset-names:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>
>> The same.
>>
>
> I forgot to test the intermediate patch...
> Before I send a new version, does the final document is okay ?
Looks ok, if it works. :) I don't remember if dtschema likes the cases:
clock-names:
minItems:3
maxItems:4
if:
...
clock-names:
items:
- ...
...
maxItems:3
This should work correctly, but dtschema has checks for unneeded
min/maxItems so be sure they are not complaining.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists