lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:18:47 +0800
From:   Zong Li <zongbox@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com, green.wan@...ive.com, vkoul@...nel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        alexandre.ghiti@...onical.com, palmer@...ive.com,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: sifive: fu540-c000: align dma node name
 with dtschema

Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> 於 2022年4月19日 週二 下午6:59寫道:
>
> On 19/04/2022 12:57, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
> >>> Not sure that this one is actually needed Krzysztof, Zong Li has a fix
> >>> for this in his series of fixes for the sifive pdma:
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/edd72c0cca1ebceddc032ff6ec2284e3f48c5ad3.1648461096.git.zong.li@sifive.com/
> >>>
> >>> Maybe you could add your review to his version?
> >>
> >> Zong's Li patch was sent 10 days after my patch... [1] Why riscv DTS
> >> patches take so much time to pick up?
> >>
> >
> > Oh, my bad. I incorrectly assumed that that patch was present before v8,
> > I should've checked further back - sorry!
>
> No problem :)
>
> I don't mind Zong's patch to be taken although in general I believe more
> in FIFO (or FIF Served) style.
>

Hi all,
Thanks Conor brings me here. The patch 1 and 4 in my series has been
applied into dmaengine/next, but patch 2 and 3 should go by riscv
tree, so I guess that I could re-send the patch 2 based on top of
Krzysztof's patch, then let's drop the patch 2 & 3 of another
patchset. I will keep follow up here. Thanks all.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ