[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9ef4940-9aca-1932-c04d-e554cecfbe31@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:21:39 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>, kernel@...s.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: make !MMU iounmap an inline function
Hi Geert!
On 4/19/22 11:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Rich, Sato-san,
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 12:01 AM Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
>> On 4/14/22 03:12, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
>>> The current definition of sh's !MMU iounmap makes it unusable in certain
>>> kinds of code, such as this instance caught by 0day on a patch posted to
>>> the mailing lists:
>>>
>>> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13,
>>> from drivers/mtd/devices/phram.c:21:
>>> drivers/mtd/devices/phram.c: In function 'register_device':
>>> arch/sh/include/asm/io.h:274:33: error: expected expression before 'do'
>>> 274 | #define iounmap(addr) do { } while (0)
>>> | ^~
>>> drivers/mtd/devices/phram.c:150:44: note: in expansion of macro 'iounmap'
>>> 150 | cached ? memunmap(new->mtd.priv) : iounmap(new->mtd.priv);
>>> | ^~~~~~~
>>>
>>> Make it an inline function as it was earlier.
>>>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202204131446.omJ5mC54-lkp@intel.com/
>>> Fixes: 13f1fc870dd747131 ("sh: move the ioremap implementation out of line")
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
>>
>> Tested-by: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
>>
>> Worked For Me.
>
> Can we please get any of [1], [2], [3], or [4] applied and sent
> upstream, so people can stop wasting time on recreating and
> resubmitting similar patches all the time?
I agree. Those patches shouldn't be sent in vain. I very much appreciate everyone
sending in patches to improve Linux support for SH which is why I find it saddening
that the maintainers don't find enough time to review the patches.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@...ian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists