[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220420180902.GJ2951@kadam>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 21:09:03 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192u: change get_key functions to return 0
instead of -1
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 04:52:36PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On mercoledì 20 aprile 2022 14:23:28 CEST Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> > Currently, these three get_key functions return -1 when the provided len
> > value is less a specific key length value, which can result in buffer
> > overflow depending on how the returned value is used. These functions are
> > used in three places in ieee80211/ieee80211_wx.c:
> >
> > ieee80211_wx_get_encode() :
> > The behavior of this function will be unchanged.
> >
> > ieee80211_wx_get_encode_ext() :
> > The result of the get_key function is written to ext->key_len,
> > resulting in a buffer overflow if the result is negative.
> >
> > ieee80211_wx_set_encode() :
> > The behavior of this function will change. When len is less than the
> > key length value, it will set a default key of all 0.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_ccmp.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_tkip.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> I was not able to find the message where Dan suggested this solution.
> However it looks that we actually have problems in those callers when they
> get '-1' as the return code.
>
> I didn't look at the code with much attention but I think that returning
> '0' to signal errors is not so good.
>
> If I'm not missing something from the context, I'd rather return '-EINVAL'
> and change the callers to check for this specific error that would signal
> we have "len less than a specific len value". If so, act in accordance to
> the returned -EINVAL.
>
> For example, in a caller you may test:
>
> if (ext->key_len == -EINVAL || <some other test, if required>)
> <error path>
> <success path>
These are valid questions.
Ideally the errors wouldn't happen. Maybe they don't happen?
The error handling is copied from ieee80211_wx_get_encode_ext(). An all
zero password (rot13 security) is better than plaintext. So this is a
conservative fix which potentially fixes some memory corruption and
doesn't break anything.
A more extensive fix would require someone who understands the code
better or can test it.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists