linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] dt-bindings: dma: Convert Qualcomm BAM DMA binding to json format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:47:04 +0530
From:   Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
To:     Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] dt-bindings: dma: Convert Qualcomm BAM DMA binding
 to json format

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 at 21:03, Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 06:59:55PM +0530, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
> > > I appreciate your work Kuldeep, it is important and valuable
> > > contribution. It is sad to see duplicated effort, I don't like it for my
> > > own patches either. In general, I believe the FIFO approach should be
> > > applied, so in this case Bhupesh patches.
> >
> > Yep, I also agree with FIFO approach w.r.t contributions. But one thing
> > daunts me here is the waiting time with latest revision, it's too high.
> >
> > Anyway, Bhupesh had more than BAM changes and was already on v5, I can
> > give benefit of doubt to him and won't argue much here.
> >
> > Bhupesh, feel free to include my armv7 based dts patches in your series
> > otherwise you might stumble DT checks warnings.
>
> Or do you want me to keep my changes separate? Sorry for spam.

Please send your changes separately, as my patchset already exceeds 25
patches or so in the current form.

Thanks,
Bhupesh