lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH=2NtwxX5Gj9bD3ymN0bJcqNnwi-pr2sDkm1s8iBOaMFJRvWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:47:04 +0530
From:   Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
To:     Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] dt-bindings: dma: Convert Qualcomm BAM DMA binding
 to json format

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 at 21:03, Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 06:59:55PM +0530, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
> > > I appreciate your work Kuldeep, it is important and valuable
> > > contribution. It is sad to see duplicated effort, I don't like it for my
> > > own patches either. In general, I believe the FIFO approach should be
> > > applied, so in this case Bhupesh patches.
> >
> > Yep, I also agree with FIFO approach w.r.t contributions. But one thing
> > daunts me here is the waiting time with latest revision, it's too high.
> >
> > Anyway, Bhupesh had more than BAM changes and was already on v5, I can
> > give benefit of doubt to him and won't argue much here.
> >
> > Bhupesh, feel free to include my armv7 based dts patches in your series
> > otherwise you might stumble DT checks warnings.
>
> Or do you want me to keep my changes separate? Sorry for spam.

Please send your changes separately, as my patchset already exceeds 25
patches or so in the current form.

Thanks,
Bhupesh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ