[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220420153316.GA63129@9a2d8922b8f1>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 21:03:16 +0530
From: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@...il.com>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] dt-bindings: dma: Convert Qualcomm BAM DMA
binding to json format
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 06:59:55PM +0530, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
> > I appreciate your work Kuldeep, it is important and valuable
> > contribution. It is sad to see duplicated effort, I don't like it for my
> > own patches either. In general, I believe the FIFO approach should be
> > applied, so in this case Bhupesh patches.
>
> Yep, I also agree with FIFO approach w.r.t contributions. But one thing
> daunts me here is the waiting time with latest revision, it's too high.
>
> Anyway, Bhupesh had more than BAM changes and was already on v5, I can
> give benefit of doubt to him and won't argue much here.
>
> Bhupesh, feel free to include my armv7 based dts patches in your series
> otherwise you might stumble DT checks warnings.
Or do you want me to keep my changes separate? Sorry for spam.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists