linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dmaengine: qcom: gpi: Add minItems for interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e08a8f96-54a7-60be-0bd4-7a74fdcd627e@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:11:54 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dmaengine: qcom: gpi: Add minItems for
 interrupts

On 20/04/2022 12:36, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> If the choice is per SoC-controller, then the best would be to limit in
>> allOf:if:then. However maybe the number of channels depends also on
>> other factor (e.g. secure world configuration)?
> 
> That is quite right. So we wont know how many channels are made
> available..
> 
> So is min 1 acceptable or do you have an alternate ?

minItems:1 is ok.


Best regards,
Krzysztof