linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dmaengine: qcom: gpi: Add minItems for interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yl/vSjdRe99if4Rd@matsya>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 17:02:26 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dmaengine: qcom: gpi: Add minItems for
 interrupts

On 20-04-22, 13:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/04/2022 12:36, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >> If the choice is per SoC-controller, then the best would be to limit in
> >> allOf:if:then. However maybe the number of channels depends also on
> >> other factor (e.g. secure world configuration)?
> > 
> > That is quite right. So we wont know how many channels are made
> > available..
> > 
> > So is min 1 acceptable or do you have an alternate ?
> 
> minItems:1 is ok.

Thanks, can I get an ack?

-- 
~Vinod