[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yl/27Pz3pvARmIHn@osiris>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:05:00 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
thuth@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
wintera@...ux.ibm.com, seiden@...ux.ibm.com, nrb@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] s390x: KVM: guest support for topology function
> +static inline bool kvm_s390_topology_changed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 11))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* A new vCPU has been hotplugged */
> + if (vcpu->arch.prev_cpu == S390_KVM_TOPOLOGY_NEW_CPU)
> + return true;
> +
> + /* The real CPU backing up the vCPU moved to another socket */
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(vcpu->cpu,
> + topology_core_cpumask(vcpu->arch.prev_cpu)))
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
This seems to be wrong. I'd guess that you need
if (cpumask_test_cpu(vcpu->cpu,
topology_core_cpumask(vcpu->arch.prev_cpu)))
--> return false;
--> return true;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists