[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75a152f6-2ea3-8af9-ca9a-5493c3ac885e@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:13:27 +0200
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
thuth@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
wintera@...ux.ibm.com, seiden@...ux.ibm.com, nrb@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] s390x: KVM: guest support for topology function
On 4/20/22 14:05, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>> +static inline bool kvm_s390_topology_changed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 11))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + /* A new vCPU has been hotplugged */
>> + if (vcpu->arch.prev_cpu == S390_KVM_TOPOLOGY_NEW_CPU)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + /* The real CPU backing up the vCPU moved to another socket */
>> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(vcpu->cpu,
>> + topology_core_cpumask(vcpu->arch.prev_cpu)))
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>
> This seems to be wrong. I'd guess that you need
>
> if (cpumask_test_cpu(vcpu->cpu,
> topology_core_cpumask(vcpu->arch.prev_cpu)))
> --> return false;
> --> return true;
>
/o\
I do not know if I can do this right at the end!
Thanks, I send an update immediately
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists