linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/189] 5.15.35-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <392ba1bf-3b2a-3be2-67fc-53745eab0914@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 19 Apr 2022 21:38:10 -0500
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/189] 5.15.35-rc2 review

Hello!

On 19/04/22 18:25, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> On 19/04/22 02:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.35 release.
>> There are 189 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu, 21 Apr 2022 07:30:20 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.35-rc2.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro's test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Forgot to mention that it was

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org