[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f33efa638824ff7bb796fe69d2ab825c4bf03c70.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:35:04 +0200
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm/page_alloc: Protect PCP lists with a spinlock
Hi Hillf,
On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 22:02 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:59:05 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote:
> > void drain_zone_pages(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
> > {
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > int to_drain, batch;
> >
> > - local_lock_irqsave(&pagesets.lock, flags);
> > batch = READ_ONCE(pcp->batch);
> > to_drain = min(pcp->count, batch);
> > - if (to_drain > 0)
> > + if (to_drain > 0) {
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + /* free_pcppages_bulk expects IRQs disabled for zone->lock */
> > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&pcp->lock);
>
> Nit, spin_lock_irqsave() instead.
See cover letter's:
"This series is a partial series. Follow-on work would allow the local_irq_save
to be converted to a local_irq to avoid IRQs being disabled/enabled in most
cases. However, there are enough corner cases that it deserves a series on its
own separated by one kernel release and the priority right now is to avoid
interference of high priority tasks."
Regards,
--
Nicolás Sáenz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists