[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmAnUQdQ63jD48ad@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 11:31:29 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/uffd: Move USERFAULTFD configs into mm/
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:48:23AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> We used to have USERFAULTFD configs stored in init/. It makes sense as a
> start because that's the default place for storing syscall related configs.
>
> However userfaultfd evolved a bit in the past few years and some more
> config options were added. They're no longer related to syscalls and start
> to be not suitable to be kept in the init/ directory anymore, because
> they're pure mm concepts.
>
> But it's not ideal either to keep the userfaultfd configs separate from
> each other. Hence this patch moves the userfaultfd configs under init/ to
> be under mm/ so that we'll start to group all userfaultfd configs
> together.
>
> We do have quite a few examples of syscall related configs that are not put
> under init/Kconfig: FTRACE_SYSCALLS, SWAP, FILE_LOCKING, MEMFD_CREATE..
> They all reside in the dir where they're more suitable for the concept. So
> it seems there's no restriction to keep the role of having syscall related
> CONFIG_* under init/ only.
>
> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists