linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-1166DHP2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:45:39 +0900
From:   SHIMAMOTO Takayoshi <takayoshi.shimamoto.360@...il.com>
To:     Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, takayoshi.shimamoto.360@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-1166DHP2

Hi

I got a collaborator and decided to make a DT about the previous model 
WZR-1166DHP2, the WZR-1166DHP.
These two models differ only in memory capacity.

I will rework some of them into a common patch as dtsi and post it.

Therefore, please discard this patch.

Best regards.

On 2022/04/13 22:09, SHIMAMOTO Takayoshi wrote:
> 
> Thank you for the replies.
> 
> On 2022/04/13 2:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>   - 4x 10/100M ethernet switch
>>
>> Isn't that 10/100/1000?
> 
> You are right.
> It supports 10/100/1000Mbps.
> 
>>> +    model = "Buffalo WZR-1166DHP2 (BCM4708)";
>>
>> We stopped adding SoC name to the "model" value, please drop it.
> 
> Understood.
> 
> I will fix it as follows
> model = "Buffalo WZR-1166DHP2";
> 
>>> +
>>> +        wireless1 {
>>> +            label = "bcm53xx:amber:wireless";
>>> +            gpios = <&hc595 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> +        };
>>> +    };
>>
>> I'm wondering if all new DTS files should use "function" and "color"
>> instead of "label". That's preferred solution and I guess it's good idea
>> to use it for new code.
> 
> Understood.
> 
> I will rewrite it with "function" and "color."
> 
> I will post the patch again after testing.
> 
> Best regards